Registration is still open for our ABA Regional program in San Francisco on Friday, June 21. Click the link below to register and for more information. The program features four informative panel presentations on cutting-edge trends in class actions and mass tort litigation. Don’t miss it!
Program Registration Link
Tap加速器app下载_Tap加速器官方免费版下载 安卓版v1.3.2 ...:2021-5-28 · Tap加速器是一款高效的手游加速器，国内和外服网易超快速加速，可伍加速当前最热门的游戏。多地区节点灵活切换，轻轻一点，游戏便能飞速运行。通过这款软件，用户可伍提升游戏的运行速度，让你玩游戏不卡顿、不掉帧。涵盖市面上绝大多数热门游戏，提升你的
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
For those who weren’t able to travel all the way to Israel for the University of Haifa’s recent international class action conference, you’re in luck. Videos of all of the panel presentations are now available on YouTube. To access them, go to the conference website at http://lawers.club/ and scroll to the bottom of the page and you’ll see links for both photos and videos from the conference. You can also visit the YouTube channel directly by clicking here. I’m still working on my commentaries from the conference and will link to each presentation individually in those commentaries.
Posted in Class Action News, Class Action Trends, CLE Programs, International Class Action Law | Tagged class action conference, collective redress, haifa, International Class Action Law, university of Haifa | Leave a Comment »
I’m very pleased to be chairing the ABA Section of Litigation’s Sixth Annual Regional CLE Program on Class Actions and Mass Torts this year. The program will be held at the offices of the Bar Association of San Francisco. Breakfast begins at 8:00 a.m., and the presentation begins at 8:45 a.m. on June 21, 2023.
Click here for more information and to register.
This year’s program will kick off with a panel discussing the recent amendments to Rule 23 as well as the Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Other topics include the use of virtual law firms in class action and mass tort litigation, developments in injury-in-fact and Article III standing, and developments in how courts are dealing with variations in injury and causation in addressing the predominance factor in Rule 23(b).
Posted in class action reform, Class Action Settlements, 苹果加速器免费破解版, CLE Programs, Federal Civil Procedure, legal ethics, Mass Tort | Tagged ABA, aba section of litigation, article III, class action, 苹果加速器免费破解版, CLE Programs, injury, injury-in-fact, northern district of california, 永久免费加速器推荐苹果, rule 23 amendments, san francisco, virtual law firms | Leave a Comment »
Editor’s Note: The publication schedule for my notes of the recent international class action conference at the University of Haifa has suffered various setbacks due to staffing constraints. Of course, since I have a staff of one, I only have myself to blame. In any event, here is the third installment. Expect additional installments in the coming weeks.
Panel 2: Enforcement of consumer rights by associations and regulators
CLICK HERE FOR THE FULL VIDEO REPLAY
The second panel presentation focused on the enforcement of collective rights by regulators and associations, a phenomenon that is the current norm for many types of collective redress proceedings throughout the world. The panel discussed developments and case studies in Brazil, France, Germany, the UK, and other jurisdictions where regulatory and associational enforcement is more common, and juxtaposed those developments against the US collective redress regime, which focuses on private enforcement, particularly through the class action procedure.
【PDF编辑器(福昕)】PDF编辑器(福昕) V9.76.2.25官方免费 ...:1976-2-25 · 一款便捷实用、功能丰富的文档编辑工具 【基本介绍】 昕pdf编辑器是一款便捷实用、功能丰富的文档编辑工具，它拥有启动速度快、浏览迅速、内存占用小等多个优点，不仅可伍浏览各种pdf文件，还能编辑pdf文档的页面内容，进行插入、修改、移除、旋转、复制等操作，使用起来非常的方便。
The panel discussed criticisms that regulatory/associational enforcement model may be illusory in many cases. Regulators have the power to enforce in many EU countries by don’t often exercise it. Many public authorities don’t like the idea of pursuing redress for individual consumers, preferring to act in more of a traditional regulatory enforcement role where they seek penalties or injunctive relief, but not individual damages for injured parties. Nonprofit or special purpose associations often lack the financial incentive to pursue collective litigation, leading to a void in enforcement that is now being filled by emerging litigation funding models. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether litigation funding should be limited to not-for-profit public interest organizations or whether for-profit, venture capitalist litigation funding should be allowed.
有哪些可伍加速视频播放的软件？ - 知乎 - Zhihu:2021-8-23 · 天啊！为了这个加速软件我下载了大概七八上十个软件来用 大概我太笨了吧 好多不太会用 然后摸索了好久 还不死心的去微博找某些软件的客服问 怎么用 哈哈哈哈哈 功夫不负有心人 我找到一个适合苹果手机使用 页面简单 可伍看百度云资料的软件了 欧耶 oplayer lite.
壹点壹客苹果版下载_壹点壹客iOS版免费下载-太平洋下载中心:2021-2-26 · 壹点壹客苹果版的存在就是为了不让你辜负美食与爱！APP功能简介： 几十款超人气蛋糕，任你选择。在线支付、货到付款 ...
I found this presentation intriguing because it offered a summary of the key comparative differences between collective redress regimes available outside the US as compared to the US class action model, and offered key insights into many of the policy rationales underlying those differences.
Posted in CLE Programs, International Class Action Law | Tagged american rule, 推荐几款免费加速器, class action, 苹果加速器免费破解版, collective redress, loser pays, opt in, opt out, regulatory enforcement | Leave a Comment »
Later this month, the ABA Section of Litigation Class Action and Derivative Suits Committee (CADS), will be sponsoring a one-hour roundtable teleconference on trend in litigation funding. The program is a free benefit of Section of Litigation membership. A summary description of the presentation is below. For more information and to register, click this link.
Program Title: The Evolving Landscape of Litigation Funding
Program Description:
The use of third-party capital to pay for costs related to litigation in return for a portion of the financial judgment, commonly referred to as Litigation Funding, has been increasing. Join our esteemed panelists for a discussion regarding how Litigation Funding is changing the litigation landscape, the direct and indirect impact on litigants, their counsel, and investors, and criticisms of third-party financing.
Panelists:
Christine Azar, Esq., Burford Capital
Catherine Rowsey, Esq., Thompson & Knight
Kevin Skrzysowski, Risk Settlements
Moderator:
Angela Sabbe, Ankura
Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2023
Time: 10a PT / 1p ET
永久免费加速器推荐苹果 1 hour
Posted in class action reform, 免费爬墙加速器苹果版 | Tagged litigation funding | Leave a Comment »
My promise to provide close-to-real-time updates of the Haifa conference was derailed by my lack of a Israeli power cord adapter to charge my laptop. In truth, Israel mostly uses the same two-pronged circular plugs used throughout Europe, but I forgot adapters altogether, and it sounds better to say that I lacked a specific adaptor unique to one small country. In any event, I now have to convert my combined typed and handwritten conference notes to a series of blogs in lieu of live-blogging.
I will not attempt to give a detailed narrative of everything that was said during each presentation. Instead, I’ll give you just a few of the highlights and insights I gained from each presentation. What follows is the first installment. You’ll observe that my notes became less detailed as the conference went on. Please be assured that this is not a reflection of any diminishing quality in the content, but rather a symptom of my less-than-admirable work ethic.
But don’t fear, the conference was videotaped in its entirety, so very soon you’ll be able to enjoy all of the content as if you were there in person. Check back for updates (but by now I’m sure you’ve learned, don’t hold your breath). For now, you can find the conference materials here.
Panel 1: Class and collective redress – Global co-operation and developments
苹果发全系电脑新品 Retina 版 iPad mini 面世 - OSCHINA:2021-10-23 · openEuler项目召集伌就在暑期2021，最高6万元奖金等你来领！>>> 北京时间10月23日凌晨1点，苹果在旧金山芳草地艺术中心举行新品发布会，全面更新了平板电脑、台式电脑、笔记本电脑等产品线，推出了iPad Air、Retina版iPad mini、新款13英寸 ...
University of California Hastings Law Professor Richard Marcus introduced a theme that would resonate throughout the remainder of the conference: the idea of US-style class actions being the “Big Bad Wolf” of collective redress procedures, at least as viewed by many in other jurisdictions considering similar procedures. Marcus focused his comments not only on how class action practice has been changing in the US in recent years, but also on the explosion of multi-district litigation over the past 15 years.
The remaining panelists gave updates on developments in collective actions in other jurisdictions, primarily civil law jurisdictions, juxtaposing those developments against the “Big Bad Wolf”. Professor Astrid Stadler discussed competing proposals being considered for a collective redress regime in the European Union, one proposed by the EU commission, which would cover consumer law only, and a competing proposal from ELI/UNIDROIT, which would be a general procedure not limited by subject matter. Both proposals would include a limited opt-out procedure, where non-parties to the litigation could be bound by the outcome unless they opt out, as opposed to having to do something affirmative to opt in to the litigation.
一口气推出33款：Intel十伋桌面版酷睿让AMD怕了吗？|AMD ...:2021-5-2 · 原标题：一口气推出33款：Intel十伋桌面版酷睿让AMD怕了吗？ 来源：超能网 在经过了几个月的“预热”之后，Intel发布了第十伋桌面版酷睿处理器 ...
Professor Ianika Tzankova next offered insights about developments in the Netherlands. She pointed out that Dutch law provides for an interesting combination of typical civil law collective redress procedures but also includes a mechanism for settlement of mass disputes that allows for class action settlements similar to those available under US law. She described a new Dutch collective action law that has recently been passed by the legislature but has not yet come into force.
Professor Claudia Lima Marques discussed the rise of “model” cases resolution and the fall of “class actions” in Brazil. Brazil has an existing collective action procedure, but a recently enacted law calls for issues common to repetitive cases to be identified by the courts and treated as model cases and put on a fast track for resolution, where the decision in the model case becomes binding on other cases involving similar issues. She noted that the current law does not give any priority for collective actions to be chosen as model cases, so the effect is often that an individual litigant’s case is chosen as a model while collective actions are stayed. A bill to give collective actions priority as model cases has failed.
完美游戏体验除了十伋酷睿高独显 这几款设备也必不可少 ...:2021-6-12 · 今年618开门红活动可伍用火爆来形容，苹果5秒钟破5亿元，其中销量最高的机型为iPhone11。而在国产品牌销量排行里面前几名手机都跟苹果有同一个共性，就是支持WiFi6网络。 相信2021年大家对WiFi6技术已经有了一。
Posted in CLE Programs, International Class Action Law | Tagged brazil, 苹果加速器永久免费, comparative law, dutch, EU european union, international class actions, israel, netherlands, UK, United States | Leave a Comment »
My loyal readers (I’m being optimistic in using the plural form) will note that ClassActionBlawg.com has been inactive for the better part of a year. With my current workload, I can’t promise significantly more content in the near future, but I did promise one loyal reader to provide some highlights from the University of Haifa’s 3rd International Conference on class actions. Here is the first installment.
Introduction
The conference began with a warm welcome to Haifa from Conference Co-Chair Dr. Rabeea Assy as well as introductory remarks from other conference organizers. One highlight for me was a brief summary from City University of Hong Kong Dean Geraint Howells of recent developments in Asia. Howells described developments in class and collective actions in Hong Kong, which he described as “on the agenda” but slow in starting. He also provided updates on class and collective mechanisms in force in a variety of other Asian countries, including Japan, Korea, Thailand, Singapore, and India.
Conference co-chair Dr. Ariel Flavian began his remarks with the point that the growth of global trade means more international scandals and a need for the development of new schemes for collective redress. He then previewed recent developments in the EU, UK, Brazil, The Netherlands, the US, and elsewhere, which will be addressed in more detail throughout the conference.
CLICK HERE TO SEE A VIDEO REPLAY
Posted in Class Action Trends, CLE Programs | 苹果加速器免费破解版
网易UU网游加速器最新下载_网易UU网游加速器免费版 - 软件帝:2021-6-13 · 软件帝为你带来网易UU网游加速器 2.20.1 官方版免费版免费下载。网易UU网游加速器是一款功能强大、拥有创新透明界面设计的网游加速器。它软件小巧，无广告骚扰，支持加速节点更换，支持创建快捷加速，提供快速反馈通道。网易UU网游加速器 ...
Posted in Class Action Trends, CLE Programs, International Class Action Law | Tagged class action, collective redress, international class action, International Class Action Law, israel, posner, statistics, university of Haifa | Leave a Comment »
I’m proud to announce that I’ll be chairing the 5th Annual ABA Western Regional CLE on Class Actions and Mass Torts, scheduled for next Friday, June 22, 2018 at the offices of Clyde & Co. in San Francisco. The program is co-sponsored by the Class Actions and Derivative Suits, Mass Torts, Consumer Litigation, Antitrust Litigation, and Securities Litigation Committees of the ABA Section of Litigation. This year’s program covers a variety of timely class action-related topics, including ethics for those of you needing to fulfill your ethics CLE obligation. For more information and to register, see the link below. Hope to see you there!
http://shop.americanbar.org/ebus/ABAEventsCalendar/EventDetails.aspx?productId=327287675
Posted in 推荐几款免费加速器, CLE Programs | Tagged ABA, cads, class action, class action ethics, 苹果加速器永久免费, regional program, san francisco | Leave a Comment »
Next week, I’ll be presenting in webinars addressing two trendy topics in class actions.
Next Tuesday, January 23, at 1:00 PM EST, Brian Troyer of Thompson Hine in Cleveland and I will be reprising a Stafford Publications webinar titled Statistics in Class Certification and at Trial: Leveraging and Attacking Statistical Evidence. For more information and to register, please visit this link to the Strafford Publications website.
The next day, Wednesday January 24, at 1:00 PM EST, my partners Melissa Seibert, Melinda McLellan and I will be presenting a BakerHostetler client Webinar titled Emerging Biometric Data Privacy Risks. Among other things, that webinar will address trends in consumer and employment class actions involving unauthorized use or disclosure of biometric information. For more information and to register, please visit this link to the BakerHostetler website.
Posted in Class Action Trends, CLE Programs | Tagged biometric, biometrics, bipa, 苹果网络加速器下载, consumer class action, daubert, employment class action, privacy, privacy class action, regression analysis, 苹果加速器免费版有几款, statistical evidence, 永久免费加速器推荐苹果 | Leave a Comment »
Older Posts »
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 | ||||||
Feedburner Feed
